What are the differences between the 2009 Ford Escape Hybrid vs the non hybrid?

Is the only difference the Hybrid part? Or are there any other differences such as safety?
I’m hoping to buy one soon and would really like to get a hybrid suv to be eco-friendly but not sure I would save the $10,000 price difference between the hybrid & non-hybrid version in the long run.

The car is built the same way, so it will be just as safe in either model. The Hybrid has optional soy-cloth seats which are obviously green yet still durable since there’s no plastic which is petroleum/fuel.

If you do get the hybrid though, plan on keeping it for 5+ years because if you just want to sell it under that time frame then you just wasted $10,000.

Also, the intent of a hybrid is mostly for stop-and-start city driving, so if your job has you commuting on the expressway every day for a good distance, then the four-cylinder will get you about the same mileage, and hey, you saved $10,000.

Good choice for a vehicle though, you’ll like it no matter what model you get.

5 Responses to “What are the differences between the 2009 Ford Escape Hybrid vs the non hybrid?”

  1. Stupid Flanders says:

    About 7-10 mpg.
    Reliability and Safety will be comparable.
    The acceleration on the non-hybrid will be slightly better, even with the 4 cylinder.

    Ford uses the same synergy technology as Toyota, and it is extremely reliable. Down the road, you will likely make up a little of the savings on the hybrid because they have regenerative brakes and the fact that the hybrid does not have a timing belt that needs to be changed.

    This will make up some of the difference, but for $10K, it is hard to justify picking the hybrid unless gas skyrockets or you want to drive as green as possible and have the money to spend.
    References :

  2. Corey says:

    well i think its both 4-cyllinder and v-6 then 4-cylinder hybrid and v-6hybrid also, so yes the hybrid is different but you get bettter gas mileage
    References :
    professional driver

  3. Rusty Shackleford says:

    I wouldn’t recommend the hybrid unless you plan on keeping it for 6+ years and plan on putting 100,000+ miles on it in that time frame. To me, the 10k price difference isn’t worth the maybe 10mpg you’ll be getting better and that’s if you drive like a saint.
    References :

  4. Do You Buy American? says:

    The car is built the same way, so it will be just as safe in either model. The Hybrid has optional soy-cloth seats which are obviously green yet still durable since there’s no plastic which is petroleum/fuel.

    If you do get the hybrid though, plan on keeping it for 5+ years because if you just want to sell it under that time frame then you just wasted $10,000.

    Also, the intent of a hybrid is mostly for stop-and-start city driving, so if your job has you commuting on the expressway every day for a good distance, then the four-cylinder will get you about the same mileage, and hey, you saved $10,000.

    Good choice for a vehicle though, you’ll like it no matter what model you get.
    References :

  5. InteractiveJunkie says:

    they are using similar technologies however are you looking to save money overall or trying to reduce your carbon foot print and possibly save money.

    Here are a few links that should help:
    http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2009-ford-escape-hybrid-review/
    http://ecotechdaily.com/2009/06/12/test-drive-and-report-on-the-2009-ford-escape-suv-hybrid/

    good luck
    References :
    http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2009-ford-escape-hybrid-review/
    http://ecotechdaily.com/2009/06/12/test-drive-and-report-on-the-2009-ford-escape-suv-hybrid/

Leave a Reply